The
Wall Street Journal reports that one of the
central challenges confronting states as they set up health-insurance exchanges
is what to call them. The exchanges are
a central part of the Obama administration’s health overhaul, serving as
marketplaces for people to shop for coverage.
As many as 25 million people are supposed to gain coverage through the
exchanges over the next decade, but states are finding that many people don’t
know what an exchange is and don’t necessarily like the sound of it.
“Many of these new terms – such as bundled
payment, meaningful use, and accountable care organization – still cause
confusion to those not directly involved with these changes. With this new lexicon comes a lack of
clarity. Recent surveys show that many
decision makers may not be familiar with the evolving language. For example, the 2011 HCPlexus/Thomson
Reuters National Physician Survey found that 45 percent of the responding
doctors did not fully understand the term “accountable care organization.”
There
are countless examples of how simple changes to word choice can influence human
behavior. In his New York Times Bestseller Words That Work,
pollster Frank Luntz
explains how politicians carefully replaced the term “global warming” with
“climate change” and “estate tax” with “death tax” to galvanize support for
their causes. And it worked.
With
so much focus on creating healthcare reforms that will work in the real-world,
we must also think about the human touch-points for those reforms and how they
are being interpreted.
No comments:
Post a Comment